* Lint functions
* Fix assignment of `settings.minify`
* Use a for loop to avoid copied code for the `minify = true` and
`minify = false` cases
* Put each resource fetch into its own test case
* Check for 200 status code
* Use `.expect()` to check header value
* Use `.expect(fn)` instead of `.then(fn)`
* docs: fix links from TOC to Headings
* docs: Styling
Just a little modernisation of the appearance of the documentation
* Update src/bin/doc/package.json
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
Firefox 52 has issues with rendering SVG animations which caused random tests to fail. Less than 2% of total Firefox users now use Firefox 52 so we're safe to drop testing for it.
The testing approach was redone to fix numerous issues:
* Even if the tests had been working, none of them would have caught
https://github.com/ether/etherpad-lite/issues/4808 because they
didn't exercise the client-side import logic. Now they do.
* Follow-up logic was not in the `helper.waitFor()` callback like it
should have been. Now the code uses `async` and `await` to ensure
proper execution order.
* All `$.ajax()` calls used `async: false`. Now they're properly
asynchronous.
* The `helper.waitFor()` condition callbacks threw instead of
returning false.
* The string comparisons didn't allow for different attribute
order (e.g., `<ol start="1" class="list-number1">` vs. `<ol
class="list-number1" start="1">`). Now `Node.isEqualNode()` is
used to reduce fragility. (`Node.isEqualNode()` is not perfect, so
the tests are still a bit fragile: If class names or style strings
are in a different order then `Node.isEqualNode()` will return
false even if the nodes are semantically equivalent.)
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
* CI: Leave log level at INFO for frontend tests
* CI: Disable frontend admin tests for non-admin workflow
* CI: Disable import/export rate limiting for frontend tests
* tests: fix importexport tests
The testing approach was redone to fix numerous issues:
* Even if the tests had been working, none of them would have caught
https://github.com/ether/etherpad-lite/issues/4808 because they
didn't exercise the client-side import logic. Now they do.
* Follow-up logic was not in the `helper.waitFor()` callback like it
should have been. Now the code uses `async` and `await` to ensure
proper execution order.
* All `$.ajax()` calls used `async: false`. Now they're properly
asynchronous.
* The `helper.waitFor()` condition callbacks threw instead of
returning false.
* The string comparisons didn't allow for different attribute
order (e.g., `<ol start="1" class="list-number1">` vs. `<ol
class="list-number1" start="1">`). Now `Node.isEqualNode()` is
used to reduce fragility. (`Node.isEqualNode()` is not perfect, so
the tests are still a bit fragile: If class names or style strings
are in a different order then `Node.isEqualNode()` will return
false even if the nodes are semantically equivalent.)
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
* code tidy up: always evaluates
* tidy up: is always true
* tidy up: remove unused code
* always true/false variables
* unused variable
* tidy up: remove unused code in caretPosition.js
* for squash: Revert "tidy up: remove unused code in caretPosition.js"
The `if` condition was previously always true, so the body should be
preserved. If the body is preserved, other logic can be deleted. I
opened PR #4845 to clean it all up.
This reverts commit 75b03e5a7d.
* for squash: simplify
* for squash: Explain that the getter is used for its side effects
It's very weird to call a getter without using its return value. Add a
comment explaining why this is done so that the reader doesn't get
confused.
* for squash: Revert "tidy up: remove unused code"
The exception test was the purpose of the code.
This reverts commit 85153b1676.
* for squash: Log the tsort results
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
* pluginfw: Warn plugins on missing plugin
Add functionality to console.warn when a plugin is missing. This will help admins know when people are trying to use plugins that are missing. Resolves https://github.com/ether/etherpad-lite/issues/4730
* pluginfw: importing .etherpad can notify admins of missing plugins
Extending .etherpad imports to notify admins if a missing plugin is present
* Update ImportEtherpad.js
This also makes the full line number element clickable to ensure a positive UX for the ``?lineNumber`` URL endpoint. It also makes it more obvious that a click action can happen based on the hover.
Make line numbers stick to baseline of first line of wrapped content and editor lines with increased line hieght.
Make it compatible with ep_author_neat
Due to a recent release that wasn't functioning properly this CI will help us catch the majority of Microsoft Node Quirks before they make it into a release.
This fixes a bug introduced in commit
b711ff6acf. Some time between when that
commit was originally written and when it was merged a round of
linting had converted the function from a regular function to an arrow
function because `this` was never in the body of the function. When I
rebased the commit, which introduced `this` to the body, I didn't
catch the error.
* tests: Restore `runnerBackend.sh`
`runnerBackend.sh` was deleted in commit
7dae5e3db8 but plugins still need it
until their GitHub workflow definitions have been updated.
Co-authored-by: John McLear <john@mclear.co.uk>
This makes it possible to change the rate limiter settings via
`/admin/settings` or by modifying the appropriate settings object and
reinvoking the hook.
I can't see any reason this would be necessary, and it appears to not
behave as intended (`scroll.scrollWhenPressArrowKeys()` is not invoked
after a continuously held arrow key is finally let up).
Patch-specific release branches should never diverge from the tag, so
they serve no useful purpose. (If they do diverge, which some did
before I deleted them all, what does it mean? Are we going to move the
tag in the future? It's just too confusing.)
In the future we might want to do major- or minor-specific
branches (e.g., `release/1` or `release/1.8`), but only if we want to
maintain old releases. For example, if 2.0 is a major release that
doesn't work with plugins designed for 1.x we might want to maintain a
`release/1` branch that continues to get bugfixes while the bulk of
new work continues to land on `develop`. If we do decide to maintain
old releases we'll need a new set of release scripts (or edit the
`release.js` script on the `release/1` branch).
