Normally I would let `eslint --fix` do this for me, but there's a bug
that causes:
const x = function ()
{
// ...
};
to become:
const x = ()
=> {
// ...
};
which ESLint thinks is a syntax error. (It probably is; I don't know
enough about the automatic semicolon insertion rules to be confident.)
* caching_middleware: fix gzip compression not triggered
* packages: If a client sets `Accept-Encoding: gzip`, the responseCache will
include `Content-Encoding: gzip` in all future responses, even
if a subsequent request does not set `Accept-Encoding` or another client
requests the file without setting `Accept-Encoding`.
Fix that.
* caching_middleware: use `test` instead of `match`
* add tests
* make code easier to understand
* make the regex more clear
* Fix bad paren placement in `/javascript` handler
This fixes a bug introduced in commit
ed5a635f4c.
* add regression test for #4495
* Move `/javascript` test to `specialpages.js`
Co-authored-by: webzwo0i <webzwo0i@c3d2.de>
Some authentication plugins use the users defined in the `users`
object but ignore the `password` and `hash` properties.
This change deletes all of the filtering logic, including the logic
that filters out users that have both `password` and `hash` properties
defined. I could have kept that check, but decided to remove it
because:
* There's no harm in defining both `hash` and `password`.
* Allowing both makes it easier to transition from one scheme to
another.
* It's fewer lines of code to maintain.
If `settings.json` contains a user without a `password` property then
nobody should be able to log in as that user using the built-in HTTP
basic authentication. This is true both with and without this change,
but before this change it wasn't immediately obvious that a malicious
user couldn't use an empty or null password to log in as such a user.
This commit adds an explicit nullish check and some unit tests to
ensure that an empty or null password will not work if the `password`
property is null or undefined.
This makes it possible to disable `contentEditable` for certain
elements in some circumstances (e.g., on links so that users can click
on them normally).
if animationState evaluates to -1 or 0, it would end up in a conditional that assign its value to itself. Since this is redundant, it is better to remove this conditional, to avoid an extra check
